Transportation Industry UPdates

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Browse by Tag

Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

A Change to Truck Drivers' Hours-of-Service?

  
  
  
  
  
  

Ferro resized 600When Ann Ferro, the current FMCSA Administrator, was sworn in last year, it was with the agreement that the FMCSA would review and consider crafting a new Hours of Service (HOS) rule to put a lawsuit by special interest groups, including Public Citizen, Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, and the Teamsters union, on hold. 

With this settlement, the FMCSA would be required to have a formal draft of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) by mid-July 2010, and would publish a final rule within 21 months of the date of settlement (Oct. 26, 2009), which would be July 26, 2011.

Between January and March 2010, the FMCSA held a total of 5 listening sessions across the country to get feedback from both drivers and carriers regarding current HOS rules, and any proposed changes.

Those who attended the listening sessions, both motor carriers and drivers, were primarily in favor of keeping the current HOS rules – a 14-hour workday, with a maximum 11 hours of drive time and 3 hours for loading/unloading, followed by a 10-hour off-duty period.  The current rules also limit drivers to 60/70 hours on duty in 7/8 consecutive days.  They then may restart their 7/8 consecutive day period after taking 34 or more consecutive hours off duty – also known as the “34-hour restart” provision. 

From a safety perspective, the current HOS rules are working.  "In the very real world of trucking, highway safety has improved in the past 6 years under these rules," said Dave Osiecki, ATA’s VP of Safety, Security & Operations.  According to Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) figures released earlier this year, the truck-involved fatality rate in 2008 declined 12.3 percent from 2007.  This decline marks the largest year-to-year drop ever and the fifth consecutive year the fatality rate has improved.  Since new hours-of-service regulations took effect in 2005, the truck-involved fatality rate has come down more than 20 percent and is at its lowest since the U.S. Department of Transportation began keeping those records in 1975. The fatality rate has declined more than 66 percent since 1975.

According to research by the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI) on the current HOS rules, the total collision rate was down 11.7 percent and preventable collisions decreased 30.6 percent from 2004 to 2009.  Another key finding from ATRI’s analysis was that, in 2009, the majority of commercial vehicle crashes (87%) occurred within the first eight hours of driving.  A similar trend was found in an analysis of fatal truck collisions using the Trucks Involved in Fatal Accidents (TIFA) database.  A review of 2007 TIFA data showed that 80 percent of fatal truck collisions occurred within the first eight hours of driving.

HOS Chart   8 hrs. resized 600

 

 

This chart displays the distribution of DOT recordable collisions for each of the 11 driving hours. The crash rate peaks during the first three hours.

However, one way to improve the rule, which was suggested by many in attendance at the 5 listening sessions, would be to allow for more flexibility in the sleeper berth provision.  This flexibility would encourage circadian friendly sleep and naps, rather than constraining drivers to one, inflexible option under the current HOS rules, which overlooks the individual needs of each driver.  The current HOS rules, with a 14-hour clock that doesn’t stop once started, discourages drivers from stopping for meals or to stretch their legs, actually increasing fatigue. 

According to the ATA, to better address the true causes of fatigue in transportation, FMCSA should focus its resources on (1) sleep disorder awareness, training and screening, (2) promoting the use of Fatigue Risk Management Programs, (3) increasing the availability of truck parking on important freight corridors, and (4) partnering with the trucking and shipping communities to develop an educational process that identifies for drivers the location of available truck parking.

The FMCSA acknowledged the industry’s pleas for more flexibility, but stressed concern over being able to prevent abuse.  FMCSA Administrator Ferro stated, "We've heard about the need for flexibility…what I haven't heard yet is how you take a rule with flexibility in it and ensure you've got sufficient structure to go after the folks that are going to abuse that flexibility.  We all know it happens today, it happened before, and it will happen again."

A recent document, filed on behalf of the Truck Safety Coalition, Public Citizen and Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, and posted on www.regulations.gov, reveals that daily driving time under a new HOS rule should be reduced by 27 percent.  The document calls for a maximum 12-hour work shift, with no more than eight consecutive hours of driving per shift.   The document, one of over 300 documents related to the new rule, also calls for universal electronic on-board recorder (EOBR) equipment.

The coalition said it wants to see a maximum of 40 driving hours in a seven-day period and a maximum of 60 hours of work time in a seven-day period.  It also wants to see a minimum 48-hour, off-duty layover, rather than the current 34-hour “restart”.  Industry reports indicate that a reduction of allowable driving time from eleven to eight hours, and elimination of the 34-hour restart rule, could cost the trucking industry $3.1 billion or more annually.   

In late June, the office of DOT Secretary Ray Lahood received the first draft of a new HOS rule from the FMCSA.   After reviewing it and determining it was not necessary to be sent back to FMCSA for revisions, the first draft was sent to the White House (Office of Management & Budget, or OMB) for what's expected to be an additional three-month review.  Currently in the NPRM stage, the proposal is by no means in a near final form. 

The OMB will consider how the rules will impact the larger picture, such as how much it will cost and how it will affect national economic policy.  Once OMB signs off on the regulation, it will then be published in the Federal Register.  The FMCSA’s goal is to publish the NPRM on November 4. 

Once published in the Federal Register, the public will, for the first time, get full disclosure of the agency’s plan on what, if any, changes will be made to the current HOS regulations. 

In April, during an FMCSA oversight hearing, Senate Sub-committee Chairman Lautenberg (D-NJ) said, “The Obama administration has made the right move by initiating a new rulemaking on driver hours…but let’s be clear: When this process is over, we cannot wind up with the same flawed regulations that the last administration designed.” 

If this is any indication on the direction of a new HOS rule, the industry could be in for a rude awakening.


Driving Ambition is a premier CDL truck driver staffing company serving Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee.  Since 2001, we have specialized in matching safe, experienced CDL drivers for our customers and great job opportunities for our professional truck drivers.

Our commitment to safety and building solid working relationships with both customers and CDL drivers has allowed us to earn an unparalleled reputation with our Proven Drivers and Exceptional Service.

 

Comments

Great commentary. Will be pushing this along.
Posted @ Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:37 AM by Bob Richie
I beleive the hours of service should remain as they are currently.We are a M-F operation with no weekends unless a special need is there and that is rare.
Posted @ Wednesday, August 11, 2010 6:51 AM by Vic Vaughn
I agree - I believe the Hours of Service should remain the same, but with one small adjustment. 
 
The consensus seemed to reflect a desire for more flexibility in the sleeper berth. If a driver is tired, he/she should be able to pull over and take a short nap, without having a negative impact on the remainder of his/her on-duty drive time.  
 
The FMCSA can't allow for this flexibility without there being a "mechanism" in place to account for it, or verify that a break actually took place.  
 
My suggestion is that a new Hours of Service rule should really be two separate rules: 
 
The first rule is exactly the same as the current rule we operate under now. 
 
The second rule should allow for "sleeper berth flexibility" for any carrier who is EOBR (electronic logs) compliant. That way they can "prove" that they are actually taking the break being logged.  
 
With this additional Hours of Service rule, more carriers will be encouraged to become EOBR compliant so they can take advantage of the sleeper berth flexibility. 
 
This is a "sure win" in the name of Safety. Isn't that what the Teamsters, Advocates, and the other special interest groups are after anyway?? (that was supposed to be a joke!)
Posted @ Wednesday, August 11, 2010 8:48 PM by Jeremy Reymer
This law has got to be changed! My husbands company is 24-7. He is forced to work as close to 70 hours as he can in a 6 day period. When he works a 14 hour day, with 10 off, in order to get 8 hours of sleep that leaves him 2 hours from the time he clocks out to have any life, so he never gets 8 hours. How is this making the roads safer?
Posted @ Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:57 PM by Carla Behrens
This 14 hour rule is ridiculous. If you unload at 6am and dont reload until 3 or 4pm, your day is almost done and youve had all day to rest. This makes no sense at all. Why force some to drive 11 hour s straight? why not let the driver sleep a few hours during rush hour to let traffic lighten up? Not every driver is the same. This is common sense. Apparently some people dont have any.
Posted @ Sunday, October 24, 2010 4:12 PM by Rick A
"This 14 hour rule is ridiculous. If you unload at 6am and dont reload until 3 or 4pm, your day is almost done and youve had all day to rest. This makes no sense at all. Why force some to drive 11 hour s straight? why not let the driver sleep a few hours during rush hour to let traffic lighten up? Not every driver is the same. This is common sense. Apparently some people dont have any." 
this guy is indicative of the problems in trucking.... who sleeps all night to unload at 6 am then goes to sleep again all day waiting to load at 3 or 4 and be fresh to drive again all night?? The answer is nobody! No person sleeps all night then gets up for 3 hours and sleeps again for 7 or 8 hrs without heavy sedatives. Rest is not equal to sleep! Im willing to bet this guy drives illegal taking caffeine pills pseudoephedrine and God only knows what else
Posted @ Tuesday, November 02, 2010 9:42 PM by stan
Are you retarded? OK, if I load the previous day and drive to where Im going to deliver, take off my ten waiting to get unloaded in the morning and it just so happens I cant reload until second shift at my shipper, so I HAD to be on duty and start my 14HOUR clock at 6am and took 3 hours to unload and dont reload until 5pm, Ive sat all day and and well rested but now Im out of hours since my 14HOUR clock has started at 6am. OK BRAINDEAD, now do you understand??? And dont say it doesnt happen, happens everyday. So STAN,ARE YOU FEELING STUPID??
Posted @ Friday, November 05, 2010 4:58 AM by Rick a
Come on Rick & Stan, let's stay focused on solutions here. We're on the same team (I think).  
 
 
 
As you know by now, there's been a delay in the proposed rule-making for a new HOS. About a month or so ago, legislation was introduced that would make EOBRs mandatory.  
 
 
 
The trucking industry has begun to "endorse" this legislation with the guidance that, if carriers are EOBR compliant, they may be able to continue with the current HOS.  
 
 
 
Once that is in place, there may be changes to the HOS that will allow for greater flexibility with breaks (naps), etc. - especially since that time can be "tracked" and accounted for because of the EOBR. 
 
 
 
Does that make sense? 
 
 
 
The argument most drivers and carriers had during this year's HOS listening sessions revolved around the allowance of greater flexibility in the sleeper berth. 
 
 
 
We'll see how things develop, but I'd definitely keep my eyes on the potential EOBR legislation and the fact that it could be a "compromise" to any changes to the current HOS.  
 
Posted @ Friday, November 05, 2010 6:33 AM by Jeremy Reymer
Modifying the sleeper berth option is IMO a way to beat the system.... drivers will say they are in their berth's on paper; but will actually be driving...... I hear way too often on the box where drivers are looking for a place to sleep because they have driven 800+ miles for the day and then say they are getting close to their "11" HOS.
Posted @ Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:12 AM by Sherman C. Ackley
I am a company driver. The company I work for has gone to electronic logs and made everybody a regional driver. I lost $1200 a month in that move. Now there talking about cutting my work hours to a max of 40 driving hours in 7 days? I drive that in 4 and a half days and not even run hard! So once again in today's society,the working man has to pay!! Is bad enough I lost miles in the regional move,(which we all know companies are doing this to screw us out of miles) I'm gonna lose more because of hours??? Why don't they do something about the way we get paid? Hey,I'm all for being safe and protecting my fellow drivers and the motoring public. This industry is good. For once, take our livelihood into consideration.
Posted @ Wednesday, February 02, 2011 9:54 PM by Johnny
i think we should go back to the old hours of operation cause i used to stop short of a big city at rush hour pull of ans go for a 2-3 hour nap and get up freash and drive the remainder of my 10 then look for a place to sleep the night and it worked for me a afternoon nap works the rest of the mammals do it
Posted @ Friday, February 04, 2011 1:47 PM by dan benard
The 34 restart should not be changed we cannot make money sitting for two days as owner operators. We cannot afford a computer and its upkeep in the trucks we are barely making a living now, and this is just the same as everything else people always possess the ability to get around it. the 14 hour is forcing the driver to spend longer behind the wheel therefor opening himself and others to more accidents.The onboard computer is taking away our rights as citizens to operate in the United States. Fatalities are decreasing because of better equipment, more training and more people having there stats made availabe to other companies needing to hire.
Posted @ Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:34 AM by Tracy Rovelli
If they change the hours of service the American trucker will go on strike and shut America down. If you people think the strikes in wisconcin are bad just wait until the dot changes the hours of service. I dont want to strike but im not losing money because of Obamas promise to the rail road unions and all of his union friends. Afterall guess who came up with the csa 2010. The rail road unions. So when the dot changes the h.o.s. get ready for the biggest economic crisis since the great depression. There will be no fuel no food no material to do business in your factory no beer no clothes no use in getting up in the morning. Because everything america needs a truck brings it to you no matter what it is and all you have to do to stop this is leave us truckers ALONE. Its that simple.
Posted @ Thursday, March 03, 2011 10:00 PM by david crockett
What does one do for 34 hrs at a truck stop? You can't sleep that long. What gives them the right to tell me I need 34 hrs of rest? What happened to a man (or woman) working for a living? If you follow the rules as they are your like on a permanent vacation. I'll just keep on doing my thing long as I can. When I can't clear $1500-$$2000 a week any more as a driver, I'll hang it up. Wake up people!
Posted @ Thursday, June 16, 2011 4:41 AM by Steven Slade
I like my 10 off that dose not mean u sleep for 10 when u get parked that's the time u get your stuff ready for the next day the hours are just fine
Posted @ Sunday, July 03, 2011 7:46 PM by Stacy
Ive been out here since 2001, 3 changes in hos?. I have not been legal in any scenario. tho. I do get my rest and lie later. fortunately I have not been caught ever. I am adjusting to the new hos regs, and the electronic junk. I actually respect that when its time for a break, break time! But. I also see alot of issues with new regs. the same as you all point out. What if we all just called in Sick for a week?. sick and tired? Ive said this before coast to coast, and all I hear is I cant afford to shut down. Duh , you shut down for restarts, and dispatchers b.s , why not just take a day or two out of your normal and we all agree on a time frame, say the month of august, and call in sick? You cant be fired, you cant be force to drive sick, and it would REALLY mess up the flow, ya know?..that way we dont get negative attention protesting and looking like aggressive druggie stressed out drivers. just quietly, hi, hey, im really sick today..youre gona have to reschedule this. sorry. and after the whole company calls in sick and 80 companies, all sitting around for a day or two..anymore than that requires a doc note..which..depression qualifys as being sick. doc. im soo depressed about my industry. I need a day off to rest..done! 
 
 
 
Im sure I will get alot of shut up stupids..but..I also have been out here a bit 10 yrs, and well..you can complain or look in the mirror and change yourself first. If you dont like the way the world is..look at the huge picture..all of it..and your blindside..aka the govt..the canadians, the queen..is trucking the only industry suffering? nooooo. but. until everyone joins together and sticks up for one another..all americans..well law abiding hard working..etc.. and fight to get family members off welfare, band together..omg i can rant and rant..but..it ticks me off that theres people makin babies and getting paid every month to sit and consume stuff we bring, and i cant even afford my rent because of some idiot who never drove a truck says i need more rest?, Oh or that because im muscular and my neck is bigger, that i may have sleep apenea and have to pay 1000. bucks to prove not?..scam!  
 
And this scenario of sleeping before a delivery? I schedule myself, aka my books to show arriving just before appt time then take a break ..which by then..yes im sleeping!, then hound dispatch and customer to git me goin!..then I drive my fanny off to the next break period..I use split sleeper , I have drivers daily log program on my puter..for 10 yrs..love it. 
 
as for electronic logs and forcing a 14 hr clock..without restart..ridiculous. 
 
 
 
Im hoping my husband gets his cdl soon. the govt and unions arent trying to shut down trucks..exactly..theyre trying to force teaming..the new, well 10 yr plus program of iso 9000 9001, is lean manufacturing , just in time and ..a team can sit standby, then run it to deliver. 
 
 
 
besides..side note..I worry not about laying over..per diem. 59.00 a day now..just got raised..I would love to see it up to 65.oo a day or more with the new rules.. 
 
 
 
ug. I said way to much in a short time im sure.but.. im on a break and just finished lunch, see ya out on the road in 30 minutes.. 
 
look out.. im on a mission too.
Posted @ Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10:12 AM by yourtruckerfriend
I am a hazmat hauler i am ok with the curent hos laws the one thing i want done is to make forced dispatch agenist the law (a fenoly) forced dispatch is the dumnst thing i have every seen I have been a trucker for 34years and i drive for a great comnpany no forced dispatch is the owners first rule.he says you don,t take risks with hazmat
Posted @ Tuesday, January 29, 2013 11:47 AM by Daniel
They say LTL night drivers will not be affected,however ,after talking to dispatch,I have been informed of some bad news. Even though I never come close to sixty hours a week, and barely fifty hours a week,and because of the two day 1-5 am period rule,and our current workload,I will be reduced to a 4 day work week. More parttime drivers will need to be found,if possible. Currently I have Wed. and Sat. off.Now I will have to take Sun. and Mon. for my two consecutive days. However I still have to take wed. off because there are very limited loads. Let's just hope I can keep my benefits. I will have to cancel my IRA deductions,and I am still going to have financial problems. I am going to have to look for a parttime non-driving job if I can for Wed.. Ya ,I would say I am "unaffected".
Posted @ Tuesday, April 16, 2013 2:11 PM by Gus
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics